| || |
| || |
|Our experimental facilities and support staff|
| || |
design of the new eye
|Eye with torsional pulley for Superior Oblique||Open position, postdoc, robotics, and Rui Cardoso, master student, control|
|Listing's Law, measured for head-restrained monkey saccades in 3D. In quaternion laboratory coordinates (r'x,r'y,r'z), Listing's plane (r'x = ar'y + br'z) has a width of only 0.6 deg.
The primary position (PP: (1, a, b)) points upwards (as the center of the oculomotor range, OMR, is about 15 deg downward); i.e., the plane is tilted re. gravity.
Figure taken from Hess et al., Vision Res., 1992.
There is controversy about the origin of this two degrees of freedom (dof) behaviour: mechanical constraints (e.g., muscle pulleys) vs. neural (control) strategies. The following arguments support a control strategy:
|Computer simulations of random 3D saccades with a nonlinear mechanical model of our 3D robotic eye with three controllers, and 6 elastic 'muscles', at realistic insertion points on the globe (by Carlos). This model can generate 3D eye orientations over a large range (e.g., torsion up to 15 deg). Optimal control on a linearised version of this model is assumed to minimize the weighted sum of different costs. Here, we show two different strategies to account for Listing's law:
Top figure includes three costs: saccade duration (p; time discount), total energy consumption during the trajectory (proportional to squared control velocity), and saccade accuracy; the latter requires the eye to be on the target T=(ry, rz) and in LP (i.e., rx = 0) at the end of the movement (at time p). PP is assumed to be straight ahead.
Bottom figure includes four costs: duration (p), energy, saccade accuracy (but now only looking at the 2D target location; torsion left free), and total muscle force at each fixation (at p).
Both models yield 3D single-axis rotations to generate saccade trajectories that keep the eye quite close to LP! The latter even yields a downward titled plane (dotted yellow line; the central OMR is at about 15 deg upward from PP), due to the force of gravity acting on our (macro-eye) system.
|Interestingly, the saccades followed nearly straight trajectories (i.e., they synchronized the 3D motor commands (top)), and yielded velocity profiles that obey the well-known nonlinear saccade main sequence (increase of saccade duration with amplitude, saturation of peak eye velocity with amplitude, and roughly a fixed-duration acceleration phase), although the model is (at present) free of (multiplicative) noise.|
elevation). Each speaker also has a central LED for visual stimulation.
while under passive two-axis sinusoidal vestibular rotation.